OCTOBER 2025

NEWSLETTER 30: September Defense Technology Digest

Illustration by: Charlotte Force

The latest speeches by Donald Trump on September 23 and by Pete Hegseth on September 30 left Europe with an understanding that if the Union is to confront Russia, the U.S. can help by selling weapons. This intensified the ongoing discussions on the highest level on Europe’s defense autonomy, which may be the only way to ensure defense capabilities.

To expand European defense industry access to funding, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz called for the ceisure of $140 billion in frozen Russian assets. In a clear break from earlier policy, Berlin, once hesitant, is now pushing to use the funds belonging to the Russian Central Bank to pay for European weapons produced for the needs of Ukraine. As Merz puts it, the money will be spent to force Moscow to the negotiating table.

Meanwhile, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced a further €2 billion funding package for drone technology, continues to mark a structural shift in how Europe perceives the nexus of technology, warfare, and its frontline security role. In Von der Leyen’s words, Ukraine constitutes “the first line of our defense.”

From across the Atlantic, Washington allowed Ukrainian strikes inside Russia with American weapons, giving Kyiv unprecedented operational scope. The U.S. is debating whether to supply long-range Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine by selling them to Europe. Europe pays, but Washington decides. Which begs a question: Is European defense autonomy possible if strategic choices remain tied to America’s interests and conditions?

Technology

At this time, Ukraine has been developing its own missiles. Flamingo, on which little precise information but a lot of communication is available, and Toloka submarine torpedo, with 70-100 km range (still in development), were both featured at Brave 1 Defense Tech Valley expo in Lviv in mid-September – a key annual deftech gathering in Ukraine. While the developers of Neptune missile (150 kg of explosive power), which sank Russian cruiser Moskva back in 2022, have announced a new version of the weapon: with 1000 km range and 260 kg explosive power, increasing Ukraine’s deep strike capacity beyond drones. 

However, scaling remains a goal to reach due to investment chokehold. The long-awaited announcement by Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky on September 19 to allow export for certain Ukrainian weapons is meant to address the access to funding problem. 

Source: HI Sutton

The drones tech presented at the Valley in Lviv focused on AI software increasing autonomy for individual drones and swarms, coordination algorithms, resilient communications, and real-time data processing. Examples of such systems developers are The Fourth Law, Swarmer. A human operator assigns targets and authorizes strikes, while a drone or a swarm of drones executes autonomously, including moving target recognition, tracking and engaging (Zir System claims 150-800 m detection range and automatic lock of up to 1 km). An AI system is fitted to multicopters or winged FPV craft or small planes and can allow to engage multiple targets, including vehicles concealed with trees. The frontline use, with intense EW, has conditioned Ukrainian shift to AI-augmented last-mile guidance for strike drones.

The DefTech Valley also featured ground drones, such as by UAV developer Vyryi, which expanded production to ground vehicles. On tracks or wheels, using Starlink or AI, Ukrainian UGVs are made to avoid obstacles and navigate any terrain and can be used for logistics, evacuation, carrying FPV drones for ambush operations. At the same time, Ark Robotics, which started as UGV developer, has expanded into robotic platforms, connecting several types of drones to military units. 

The biggest IT expo in Ukraine, IT Arena, which also took place in Lviv in the end of September, put an emphasis (through prizes) on innovation in autonomous and command-based semi-autonomous battlefield robotic systems (Dwarf Engineering), AI-based, automated EW counter-drone systems (BabAI), and next-generation mesh communication systems for UGVs able to avoid jamming (Bravo Dynamics).  

Investment

$100 million of investment in Ukrainian companies was announced at Defense Tech Valley, including the following confirmed deals:

  • NUNC Capital (Netherlands) invested €20 million in a new Venture Creation Initiative focused primarily on “New Materials” for defense applications. The goal is to reduce Ukraine’s reliance on foreign support by advancing advanced materials, supporting electronic warfare systems, and developing smart manufacturing. This initiative aims to foster local industry, create jobs, and enhance NATO integration for Ukrainian defense tech companies.

  • Verne Capital (Germany-Luxembourg) committed up to €25 million for Ukrainian defense and cybersecurity innovation. Funds will support scaling promising tech companies in defense technologies, security solutions, and cyber defense within Ukraine.

  • Varangians Fund (Sweden) unveiled a large-scale investment strategy for Ukraine and confirmed closing its first deal, leading a $1 million investment into Norda Dynamics, a startup specializing in autonomous drone systems. Varangians plans to incrementally invest up to €10 million by the end of 2025, focusing on practical battlefield solutions, drone autonomy, and supporting broader European defense transformation.

  • Oedipus INC (Europe/USA) announced its launch as the first permanent capital fund in Europe dedicated exclusively to defense tech investments. With experience in Ukrainian autonomous systems, Oedipus plans to announce ambitious partnerships with Ukrainian developers, particularly in autonomous and advanced technologies, with specific amounts and target projects to be revealed soon.

  • U.S. funds led by Broadband Capital Investments announced $15 million of investment in Swarmer. 

Since 2024 and before the Valley Expo, confirmed investments in Ukrainian defense tech stood above $90 million, with the average investment per company growing from $300,000 to $1 million, according to Mykhailo Fedorov.

In Focus: Europe’s drone wall

 

 

Source: the.world.in.maps and maven.mappings

Russia’s advance of attrition

Over the summer, Russia has been striving to convince both Ukraine and the West that it is winning the war of attrition and has the capacity to overpower and outlast Ukraine. 

Domestically, this narrative is reinforced by the scaling up and modification of Shahed/Geran’ drone production and the launch of the unprecedented autumn draft campaign of 135,000 people. The conscription, which will run from October through December 2025, is the largest fall campaign in the past nine years. Based on established practices, Russian officials are then likely to continue deceiving and coercing conscripts into signing military service contracts with the Russian Ministry of Defense to sustain offensive operations. 

The Russian determination to continue the war at all cost is also seen in the State Budget the government submitted to the Parliament on September 29.

The largest expenditures will again go to the security sectors, with national defense bill rising to €132.35 billion and national security and law enforcement one to €42.68 billion, together accounting for about 37.8% of total spending, or €175.03 billion. This is consistent with  the 2025 budget, which allocated roughly €178 billion, equivalent to 40.88% of GDP, to these areas. Russian officials noted that defense and security spending is part of the multi-year budget framework and also includes protection of critical infrastructure, anti-drone systems, cybersecurity, and related security measures.

In foreign policy, the picture is mixed: the meeting of Putin and Trump in Alaska looked triumphant for the Kremlin, but failed the test of time, as only weeks later Trump proclaimed that Kyiv can “win all of Ukraine back in its original form”, just as Ukraine has been requesting Tomahawk missiles to grow long-strike capabilities inside Russia. 

Putin sought solace in China at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit in Tianjin, where the group picture featured the leader of Russia in the middle of the new global governance alliance with China and India, in contrast to the Secretary General of the UN, leaning to fit in from extreme right-hand corner of the picture. However, the announcement by Russia of a long-negotiated deal of a second gas pipeline from Russia to China remains unconfirmed by Beijing, rid of details or deadlines. At the same time, economists attribute the ruble’s recent resilience to a surge in foreign currency deposits, likely fuelled by an inflow from China. Reportedly China made a $12 billion prepayment to Rosneft for oil supplies, which temporarily supported the currency despite worsening trade conditions and monetary growth.

On the frontline the Russians’ spring–summer offensive campaign of 2025 along the front line is nearing its conclusion. During this time, Russian forces nearly halved their pace of occupation, bringing the total occupied area to 19.04% of Ukraine. Military analysis shows that in September, Russia occupied around 250 km² of Ukrainian territory, less than in June, July, or August, while losing less military personnel in dead and wounded (around 29,000 soldiers per month). 

At the same time, Russia has intensified its attacks on Ukrainian energy grid ahead of the heating system, leading to a blackout in Chernihiv, while escalating tensions around the Chornobyl and Zaporizhia nuclear power plants. The latter can be linked to Russia’s long-anticipated plans to connect the Zaporizhia Nuclear Power Plant to its own power grid in the event of an external power loss, first reported in May and later confirmed in official correspondence with the IAEA in June. Ukraine is attempting to respond asymmetrically to Russian actions with deep strikes by drones, absent enough domestic long-range missiles. Once their production capacity is scaled, Kyiv will no longer need deep-strike permissions from Western allies. 

At sea, Ukrainian naval drones are attacking Novorossiysk, Russia’s largest seaport, which hosts the oil terminal of the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) and the Black Sea Fleet’s naval base. The CPC terminal and the Sheskharis transshipment complex, operated by Transneft, ceased loading oil after Ukraine’s drone attack.

By September 28, 38% of Russia’s refining capacity (338,000 tons per day) was offline, with approximately 70% of outages (236,000 tons per day) directly linked to drone attacks; gasoline output fell by 1 million tons in September, creating a 20% domestic shortfall and leading to scarcity in over 20 regions, including Crimea and the Far East. Repairs may take months due to sanctions blocking Western equipment, forcing Moscow to ban fuel exports, reduce import tariffs within the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU), and consider lowering environmental standards, while inflation risks rise as wholesale fuel prices have surged over 40% since January and retail prices by 11–12%, their fastest increase in seven years.

Russia, one of the world’s leading oil and petroleum products exporters, is now planning to import gasoline from China, South Korea, and Singapore, while eliminating import tariffs at specific Far Eastern checkpoints and compensating importers for the difference between world and domestic prices (disadvantageous to Russia). Rosneft, NNK, and the state-owned Promsyryeimport will handle these imports, allowing Siberian refinery output (around 150,000 tons per month) to be redirected to central Russia. The government also aims to continue imports from Belarus.

The other dimension of this warfare is rhetoric. Putin continues to emphasize Russia’s stability and legitimacy, most recently in his address marking the Day of Reunification of the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics, and parts the occupied Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson regions with Russia. He also brought up the largely forgotten concept of Novorossiya (or “New Russia,” refers to a pro-Russian geopolitical movement aimed at separating southeastern Ukraine from the rest of the country) and claimed that Russia is prevailing in what he called a ‘righteous battle’ in Ukraine.

The Ukrainian president shows no intention of backing down in the war of words, recommending that the Russian leadership should seek bomb shelters and warnings of retaliatory action against attacks on Ukraine’s energy sector. A sign that the Ukrainian armed forces possess both the necessary capabilities and support from their allies, too.

Newsletter was prepared by Anastasiya Shapochkina, Daryna Patiuk, and Bohdan Kostiuk.

Contact us and follow us to discover more and create great projects

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.